News Focus
News Focus
icon url

fuagf

06/17/24 6:29 PM

#480255 RE: Samello #480225

Hi Samello, Bottom line i think it'd be cool to see the word man not used to represent homo sapiens as it is in sentences such as: The history of man. Also would be good see more stretching themselves by using she more equally where it fits as well as he. In reference to the God of today e.g. Re mankind, agree sapiens would be better than mankind in that case, just one problem there is that sapiens has a narrower meaning .. https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/sapiens . I like woan, as it combines woman and man in 50-50 equal terms (first typed man and woman there and changed it just because it's good to keep testing ourselves in little things as that). Is fun to be aware of it. And woan places woman first where she should be because she does the nine months initial effort for each of us. Woan instead of mankind, would be good. Agree, no kind required. Man. Woan. Man could only hold such a preferentially predominant position because males made all this stuff up. This link ..

Top stuff. The fact we use he so much where she would do as well - like for God for one - is actually one example of institutional sexism.
https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=172746604

.. takes you back to an introduction to woan you likely haven't seen before. Lol, with some related chat on the way.

Afterthought: Welcome to woan world.