Replies to post #41229 on SiNtx Technologies Inc (SINT)

[boston745]

is it of your opinion that EVERY institution, EVERY insider and EVERY credible lender feels the same viz that they

show blinders to the value theyve created?

But Joe, management has created significant value, that is undeniable. While you can claim, with some evidence supporting that claim, that management is too incompetent to utilize the value created. As i said in my previous post, management or really Sonny is tied to a major player in the ortho industry. That player is not as incompetent as you believe management to be. Mr Bray is tied to a major player in the aerospace industry. Mr Palomo tied to a major player in the PPE (Antipathogenic) industry. While Joseph Palomo & Donald Bray are no longer with Sintx as employees, serving as consultants, they seemingly got Sintx ready to supply the companies from which they came. Thats a fact for Morgan Ceramics, while appearing to be true for NP Aerospace (specific division Bray oversaw within Morgan) & Cardinal Health for which Palomo was from. Since most of these things are established fact, I agree its odd that tutes & insiders have not begun taking positions yet. Insiders, including the current CEO, were buying before Sintx IPO'd. It seems something about going public caused them to stop. Thats when Anson's family of funds jumped in and began shorting and distorting. Thats also a fact, a conspiracy of funds manipulating the stockprice as ive been saying all these years. Again undeniable as thats precisely how they operate with evidence here of precisely that.

Thus i do not give weight to the lack of insider/tute buying that you do. I instead see that variable as being used as a distraction, as part of crafting an illusion, driving a false narrative. So yes, the lack of buying means something, just not what you are suggesting. That said, several major tutes are in fact keeping an eye on Sintx through small holdings (Blackrocks and Wells Fargos types); something thats been true for years. Thus negating your "winners" aren't noticing point. This suggests they are waiting for something. What that something could be, is still unclear.

[joev2]

To clarify in my last message, I'm talking specifically about defenders of such stocks like Sint; whereas 'winners' (meaning clearly above board companies) do not have people overemphasizing the 'playing' of the stock price.... These companies just do 'normal' business with various credible institutions and lenders moving them along. There's no constant drama (unlike poorly run penny plays) thrown into the mix all the time as to why the continual under performance. For the most part, if problems do arise, a company will make whatever change is necessary in order to keep the investment community interested and the company a worthwhile investment. Defenders of penny play fails, blame outside forces instead of where it belongs i.e. management, bod, etc. I see it all the time.