News Focus
News Focus
icon url

boston745

06/14/24 4:31 PM

#41221 RE: boston745 #41220

There is a specific SEC rule against short selling stock just before a public offering and then buying back the stock in the offering


According to the SEC rule referenced, Affiliate businesses (Fund B, C, D, etc) can short the company while Fund A buys the offering. This could be another reason why Anson is but one of many funds in this family of funds.

(3) Investment companies. Paragraph (a) of this section shall not prohibit an investment company (as defined by Section 3 of the Investment Company Act) that is registered under Section 8 of the Investment Company Act, or a series of such company (investment company) from purchasing an offered security where any of the following sold the offered security short during the Rule 105 restricted period:

(i) An affiliated investment company, or any series of such a company; or


https://web.archive.org/web/20200809144313/https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/17/242.105

Still, my post proves beyond a shadow of all doubt that there has been a conspiracy of funds working to short SINT despite claims no such things were going on by the very accounts which distort facts about Sintx on ST/Ihub.

This posts shows shows that there is a family of funds associated Anson Group and how those funds took turns participating in Sintx stock offerings over the years.
https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=174597546

This post shows how this group of funds work together to short offerings and buy them so, as the above shows, to circumvent rule 17 CFR § 242.105a - Short selling in connection with a public offering. That said, they do appear to be violating the rules on trading material non-public information.
https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=174599544

One of the most obvious examples of them trading on material non-public information was the run up of SINT to $2,418 ($12.09 pre-RS) on Feb 3rd 2023. This group seemingly ran the price up ahead of this offering price news to the aforementioned $2,418 and naked shorted just 3 trading days before the offering where the stockprice dropped from close of $1,863 ($9.31) Feb 3rd and closed at 666.52 (3.33) on Feb 8th. Two of Anson family of funds bought this offering. Lind Global and Intercoastal Capital. If either of these two funds naked shorted this offering this would be a violation but its likely that the other funds in this family did the naked shorting. Another interesting thing to note is how each fund took turns buying offerings thus spreading out profits and tax write offs between funds.

This article indicates how Anson and this group of funds utilize european markets for their naked shorting. Do they even need to do this via European markets when they have off-shore funds in the Caribbean?

How Anson Funds Skirts Naked Shorting Rules with Help from Big Banks, Brokers and European Regulators.
https://marketfrauds.to/moez-kassam-anson-funds-the-big-secret/

I suspect this article is truth mixed with lies as very little is sourced to anything verifiable. Not likely entirely how they operate (missing sister funds for instance) and is meant as misdirection. Still it'll contain some nuggets of truth within.

========================================

Not only have i shown there has in fact been a conspiracy of funds shorting SINT since 2015 (they've also have several accounts distorting facts about Sintx on ST/IHUB), ive also shown that Zimmer Biomet/subsidiary is/was Sintx strategic partner pertaining to the testing and development of hip implant utilizing Sintx femoral head. This after being told several times that Zimmer Biomet supplying its liners for this testing means nothing.

Proof Zimmer Biomet is one of Sintx strategic partners:

Sintx 2016 10k

Together with a strategic partner, we have initiated biomechanical testing of our solid silicon nitride femoral heads. The results of this test will be released in 2017


This quote indicates the results of testing of their femoral head with a strategic partner will be released in 2017.
Those results were released testing Sintx Femoral head against Biomet's E1 liners. Thus Zimmer Biomet, or any of its subsidiaries, is Sintx strategic partner in this testing.

Amedica and Zimmer-Biomet (Tokyo Office) provided the femoral heads and acetabular liners; however, neither company actively sponsored the research


These are risk-averse companies that look to smaller companies like us to develop an idea, uh, and, uh, de-risk it, so to speak, and then buy that technology.



Quote Sources:

https://web.archive.org/web/20240408163612/https://spineblogger.blogspot.com/2011/05/whos-next.html?m=1
2016 10-k pg 13: https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1269026/000149315217010752/form10-k.htm
2017 results: https://ir.sintx.com/news-events/press-releases/detail/95/amedica-announces-results-of-independent-femoral-head-wear
https://web.archive.org/web/20240408152758/https://sintx.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/03/Investor-Call-Transcript-033021.pdf
icon url

boston745

06/15/24 11:39 AM

#41223 RE: boston745 #41220

Pitk account seems to be part of the short n distort campaign. Either that or they want to be seen as part of it. They like to use me as a scapegoat for their actions.

Deckmaxx = Boston, be wäre the main pumper is on board


Deckmaxx is most likely connected to the short and distort campaign in that there is usually an account that acts bullish. If Deckmaxx was me itd be obvious especially with the new info I stumpled upon.

https://stocktwits.com/PitK17/message/576716590

Taman87 has been a part of this short and distort campaign since Anson family of funds bought Fall 2015 bashing Sintx the entire time.
https://stocktwits.com/TAman87/message/576698166

========================================

This posts shows shows that there is a family of funds connected to the Anson Group and how those funds took turns participating in Sintx stock offerings over the years. A conspiracy of shorting and distorting.
https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=174597546

This post shows how this group of funds work together to short offerings and buy them so, as the above shows, to circumvent rule 17 CFR § 242.105a - Short selling in connection with a public offering. That said, they do appear to be violating the rules on trading material non-public information.
https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=174599544

Meanwhile, below is what this short and distort group doesnt want you to see while they keep you distracted with low prices, excessive offerings, & reverse splits all which they help create via their Short and Distort campaign.

========================================

Silicon Nitride, a Close to Ideal Ceramic Material for Medical Application

examples of their medical applications that relate to spinal, orthopedic and dental implants, bone grafts and scaffolds, platforms for intelligent synthetic neural circuits, antibacterial and antiviral particles and coatings, optical biosensors, and nano-photonic waveguides for sophisticated medical diagnostic devices are all covered in the research reviewed herein. The examples provided convincingly show that silicon nitride is destined to become a leader to replace titanium and other entrenched biomaterials in many fields of medicine.


https://www.mdpi.com/2571-6131/4/2/16/htm

========================================

List of Markets Sintx can participate in and products in development:
https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=174489883

========================================

Sintx valuation should be greater than $230m based on comparable company:
https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=174491281

========================================

Silicon Nitride = Next Gen Hip Implant Material

Silicon nitride, silicon carbide and diamond-like carbon as non-oxide ceramics are considered to be the new generation of materials used in hip prosthetics, particularly in the manufacture of acetabular cups, due to their excellent biocompatibility, osteointegration, and tribological and mechanical properties, but all three materials need more study. However, silicon nitride is the nearest to commercialization, through businesses such as Amedica Corp. and SyntX Technologies


Im guessing the authors meant Sintx Technologies. Amedica being the companies former name before the name was sold to CTL.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10422432/

========================================

Electromagnetic fields, metal implant corrosion, and dis-ease it causes


https://i.imgur.com/nLg7SXT.jpg

Cancer-Causing Effects of Orthopaedic Metal Implants in Total Hip Arthroplasty
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11011042/

Oral Cancer around Dental Implants: Are the Clinical Manifestations and the Oncogenic Mechanisms Unique?
https://www.intechopen.com/chapters/79298

https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=172932779
icon url

XenaLives

06/24/24 9:45 PM

#41263 RE: boston745 #41220

Repost - see replied to post:

This is essentially how the Anson family of funds (is Anson at the top of this family?) work SINT and its offerings.

Here is a trade that is almost guaranteed to make money, though it is also double super illegal.


These companies -- there were 13 of them, all pretty small -- raised money through what the SEC calls "confidentially marketed public offerings." A company would engage an investment bank, which would call up potential investors and ask if they wanted to buy shares in the company. The bank would do this before the company publicly announced the offering, and would "wall-cross" the potential investors, making them agree to keep the information about the offering secret until it was announced publicly.



So here's a predictable stock-market pattern and an easy way to exploit it: If a company calls you up to ask you to invest in its upcoming public offering, you should (1) say yes, (2) sell the company's stock short before the public announcement, and then (3) buy the stock back in the public offering, generally at a 10+ percent discount, a few days later.

This is of course not legal advice! It is a great trade, but it is also double super illegal, insofar as:

There is a specific SEC rule against short selling stock just before a public offering and then buying back the stock in the offering, 5 and
There is a general, and much more important, rule against trading on purloined material nonpublic information, and this is that.



trading in breach of that agreement, you are clearly violating not just the contract, but also insider trading laws, which make it illegal to trade "in breach of a fiduciary duty or other relationship of trust and confidence, while in possession of material, nonpublic information about the security."

But, you know, who will check?



Some of the funds would get wall-crossed, and then they'd tip each other and trade in the other funds to try to obscure what was going on:




When they were successful in obtaining such information, Fishoff shorted the issuer’s stock in advance of the offerings, directed trading by Chernin and Costantin in those instances when he did not place the trades on his own, and tipped Petrello, who then also shorted the stock through Brielle and Oceanview.

In many instances, the Fishoff-controlled entities for which Chernin and Costantin were fronting also participated in the offering, with the stock going to Featherwood’s account and often being used to cover the short sales.



This right here is most likely how this family of funds worked. 1+ of them would get information of a forthcoming offering which it would later participate in, and tip the others off so they can pre-short. Not sure why the author says pre-short, wouldnt this be naked shorting? They then used the shares from the offering that Fund #1 received to cover those naked short positions?


By cheating on their wall-cross agreements and shorting the stock, these guys had the effect of driving down the stock price, which probably reduced the price in the offering. These companies probably got less money for their stock because their nonpublic information was (allegedly) used against them.



Joe, this next part does have merit here and could support what you've claimed about management and the board.

Though you could have a more cynical view of this sort of thing. A company needs to sell stock, but worries that announcing a public offering will drive down its stock price and not produce any takers. So it calls some investors up privately and tells them it's doing a deal. Those investors agree to invest in the deal, but before the deal is announced they lay off their risk by shorting the company's stock. Then the deal is announced and the investors buy shares from the company to (illegally) cover their shorts. The investors get their 10 percent, or whatever, discount to the market price as a commission; their real function is not to invest in the deal but to intermediate between the company (which can't sell stock without a publicly disclosed offering) and the unsuspecting public (which buys from the "investors" before the public disclosure). The wall-cross agreement creates deniability for the company. No one's stealing from the company; they're helping the company get a deal done that would otherwise be much harder to achieve. The victims are the public who buy from the insider traders at the inflated, pre-announcement price.




There is definitely evidence supporting this, especially between 2022 RS & 2024 RS. For instance, Lind Group participated in the offering at .25 and per our discussions Joe, funds naked shorted from as high as .50s before Lind used their shares to cover those shorts at .15. Thus this group of funds "laid off their risk", making millions in a few days, and did in fact work as an intermediary between the company and the public as they dumped shares. Lind Group sold off its shares in a matter of days. This group of investors gets a hell of alot more than 10% off these offerings. After factoring in the 200:1 split theyve been shorting since 100 with a hell of a pump and dump between .04 to .22 pre-split (8-44 post split).

https://web.archive.org/web/20190331202955/https://www.bloomberg.com/opinion/articles/2015-06-03/insider-traders-made-some-easy-money-on-stock-offerings

Something Xena posted years ago here and it seems to correlate with all this, especially post split as theyve been walking the price down.

The 10000 can be wash traded back and forth freely between colluding computers. Tons of money is made so they can now walk the stock down even lower because risk has been reduced.



https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=139777542

That seems to correlate with this wash trading where funds can increase (decrease) the price with this action.

How To Run a Pyramid Scheme — But On The Stock Market




https://www.reddit.com/r/wallstreetbets/