LOL If the jerk's argument had been accepted it's easy to think what you would have seen next time.
Estimated votes blah blah say 20,000, actual votes counted 14,000. Right-wing irrefutable fact,
logical conclusion, 6,000 votes were illegally tampered with. Dems crookery, of course.
"[...]Blehm argued the difference between an estimated number of ballots expected and the actual number of ballots counted meant there were a number of ballots unaccounted for. The appeals court held that the difference between an “initial estimate and a final, precise figure” did not provide a basis to invalidate votes."
Market Data 
Markets 
AI
