That might have been an outside contributor. A lot of that is done intentionally for propaganda purposes.
Submitting an article to a established source is an old ploy of penny stock promoters to try and make their pumpery bullshit look legit... cause it's from MSN or WSJ when it actually is not. But the pumpers want you to not check that out. Some times that is difficult to ascertain.
Ironically, WSJ has now gone far right in it's news version, not particularly in the market sector.
This has been happening for quite some time in the general news and political news, probably mostly since criminal orangeass started lying since 2012 politically.
I think the political cartoonist have to bone up on other assholes soon, shittypants may not be newsworthy in a few months. A shame because he is so easy to depict.
What about your foot? Changing color like that is never a good thing. Are you a diabetic or have nerve loss in your feet?
Market Data 
Markets 
AI
