Re "someone had mentioned it was revoked and I wanted to see the bagholders that cannot seem to understand what revoked means."
That someone may have been me (in another forum), since my recollection is that you showed up here almost immediately after my post.
With few excepts all of the "bagholders" here understand what "being revoked means."
What a few -- including yourself -- don't seem to understand is 1) that stocks are revoked for more than one reason and 2) in some cases, revoked stocks can return to trading, since some (but not many) have. That misunderstanding includes the false notion that all revoked companies are no longer in existence, having no operations at all. An imputed claim is that revoked stocks are revoked because the owners/management are always guilty of fraud, which so far is not true in the case of WCVC, since it was revoked for not filing and not for fraud.
To lift a word of yours slightly out of context, namely "courtesy" -- it's funny how many who claim to only want to be helpful to 'bagholders' demonstrate their "courtesy" only with ladles loaded with schadenfruede, as if such gleeful gloating really helps anyone at all.
So, thanks for giving us your understanding of "what revoked means." Some of us think you've now given us all you've got.
Market Data 
Markets 
AI
