hap0206, Not sorry at all to throw cold water on your misrepresentation of my post. To any objective observer there was no exuberance there, just cool, clear facts, is all the article was.
"So sorry to throw cold water on your exuberance -- but it is a NYT hit piece on Trump -- otherwise known as fake news -- Reality and the NYT knows this -- tax returns, except for the few brave "do it yourselves" are prepared by tax professionals -- the returns containing numbers in the millions are prepared by heavy hitter professionals with -- guess what -- "professional liability insurance" certifying they, the pros, know what they are doing --
and these returns are in that category -- Trump not worried at all -- his pros are right and no taxes due and the IRS pays the attorney fees -- or tthe IRS wins and the insurance company pays the assessments, penalties and interest
P - so sorry -- another whiff"
It clearly was not a hit piece, strike two for you. Not fake news, that's three. Reality itself is incapable of opinion so can't know, strike four. NYT knows it's not, so strike five. Damn, they are building up faster than even i thought they might. Yes, we all know tax professionals did Trump's tax returns, the article makes that clear. It actually offered opinions of other tax professionals that Trump's tax professionals had pushed the boundaries of tax avoidance too far. Make that strikes six and seven for you. Yes, all with ""professional liability insurance"", that's strike eight, for you thinking anyone here doesn't understand that. For your "they know what they are doing" yeah, we know they do. Strike nine. I'm running out of fingers so gonna stop counting.
I was even wondering if there was the faintest chance that you could have been one of Trump's professionals who go him into the mess he is in. But guess that's stretching your credibility too far, eh. LOL
News 
Market Data 
Discover 
AI
