InvestorsHub Logo

hap0206

05/04/24 12:54 AM

#472930 RE: newmedman #472926

Here you go -- your link
===
denying their motion to substitute the United States in this action pursuant to the Westfall Act of 1988. In our prior opinion, we vacated the district court’s judgment that Trump did not act within the scope of his employment, and we certified to the D.C. Court of Appeals the following question: Under the laws of the District, were the allegedly libelous public statements made, during his term in office, by the President of the United States,
======
nothing to do with the merits of the carroll case