News Focus
News Focus
icon url

arachnodude

04/23/24 6:53 AM

#275826 RE: TRUISM #275825

Candid statements from '15. Coming to fruition looks like this:



Astute investors follow key indicative statements such as this:

In short, when we ship product sample to a potential customer, or a potential collaborative partner, it's important that that material reflect the properties of spider silk; of the strength and elasticity, so that these potential partners can see what our material can do.



After all, the plan isn't to be known for novelty items.

It's one of the reasons we've been looking more and more at countries like Vietnam that have very established production of silk and excellent quality control.



KBLB and Vietnam are forever bound now. No pivots from Spider Silk here!
icon url

TRUISM

04/23/24 7:04 AM

#275827 RE: TRUISM #275825

"We are not producing metric ton quantities at the pilot production facility.

That facility does have that capacity and I do believe that we could produce many metric tonnes of material at that facility.

We did report early on that production was increasing and it was and we have an ability to increase it further.

We also began looking at the quality of the material coming out of that facility.

And although we can produce a very large quantity of material, or a very large quantity; many metric tonnes, it didn't make any sense when looking at the quality of this material.



icon url

want2retire

04/23/24 7:31 AM

#275829 RE: TRUISM #275825

Did you really bring up Q&A from 2015? What was the goal? Hoping people wouldn’t notice it is 10 years old, 10 years behind the advancements they have seen?

So we are clear, your posts are focused on Spiber, AmSilk and now attempting to mislead investors on where Kim Thompson feels the company is TODAY?

Curious have you see the relevance of statements from almost 10 years ago?

And again raising the issue of testing. Can you provide ANY technical and performance data on the NON-SPIDER SILK MATERIALS your beloved Spiber and AMSilk have been working on? Any testing data at all would be a great start.

I know this is getting hard to watch for you. KBLB is continuing to advance without you while the goo making “competition” continues to flounder.

Might be time for a new hobby. Harassing KBLB and its investors likely won’t be as much fun, or effective, as we move FORWARD.

Sorry to disappoint.. ;-)

icon url

Bob Mullet

04/24/24 5:51 PM

#275885 RE: TRUISM #275825

Hey it’s been a while in this wash rinse repeat.

Do you remember if it’s doubling up production next step….


…or ramping up production?

Always forget which comes first. Tickles me. Ah well.