News Focus
News Focus
icon url

blackhawks

04/14/24 8:26 PM

#470213 RE: hap0206 #470202

Well no, NOT when the issue is framed in the emotionally charged language that you've framed it. However, in the real world of electoral politics the GOP is 0-fer in elections with reproductive rights on the ballot.

.... the repubs and the world know the matter is when to kill the baby

not a winning issue for you


The GOP still claims that many abortions are in the 3rd trimester, they aren't. Too many health of the mother and health of the child SCIENCE has been overlooked in the GOP's overreach on this issue.

AND the GOP is hypocritically abandoning its core abhorrence of big gubment restrictions on personal freedom.

Or is State gubment viewed as 'small' gubment?

The SCOTUS decision on Dobbs reached back into the middle ages for majority opinion 'sustenance' that most of the rest of the country views as malnourishment.

AZ Supreme Court only goes back to a 1864 law to craft a judgment that will cost the GOP AZ in '24, up and down the ticket.

6,400 people in the AZ Territory at the time and no votes for women, not much reproductive science either. But good enough for Trumpanzee legal decisions in the 21st century.
icon url

fuagf

04/14/24 9:33 PM

#470222 RE: hap0206 #470202

hap0206, This is you

icon url

janice shell

04/14/24 10:38 PM

#470234 RE: hap0206 #470202

You call it matters of reproductive health -- the repubs and the world know the matter is when to kill the baby

Newsflash: Most of us don't believe a tiny fetus is a "baby". We do not believe a fertilized egg is a "baby". Why do you think we human women, and females of all other species, are fertile for a fairly long time? Years, in fact. That's so if something unanticipated happens, you can try again.

If men could become pregnant, this wouldn't be an issue.

And as an addendum, stop trying to shove your religious beliefs down other people's throats.