Replies to post #468964 on Tornado Alley (PROG)

[janice shell]

The first mention:

BREAKING NEWS:
Court rejected #TrumpBond filing in #TrumpFraudVerdict for several reasons, 1 of which was #Trump failed to upload his "current financial statement" to the Court [looking forward to read].
175 million reasons why 1 mistake should not have been made, much less 3 ! pic.twitter.com/qk7nLskx5F

— Jeffrey K. Levine 🇺🇸 (@NYadvocateJKL) April 3, 2024

[fuagf]

Didn't know that. According to this, zab, it's been returned for correction. He didn't include proper documents.

According to Levine's post, Trump will need to share recent financial records in order for his bond to be accepted.

"Court rejected #TrumpBond filing in #TrumpFraudVerdict for several reasons, 1 of which was #Trump failed to upload his 'current financial statement' to the Court [looking forward to read]. 175 million reasons why 1 mistake should not have been made, much less 3!" Levine wrote ..

BREAKING NEWS:
Court rejected #TrumpBond filing in #TrumpFraudVerdict for several reasons, 1 of which was #Trump failed to upload his "current financial statement" to the Court [looking forward to read].
175 million reasons why 1 mistake should not have been made, much less 3 ! pic.twitter.com/qk7nLskx5F

— Jeffrey K. Levine 🇺🇸 (@NYadvocateJKL) April 3, 2024

.

The New York County Supreme Court document he shared read:

"The court has returned the documents listed below for the following reasons: Please include a current financial statement and Power of Attorney. Additionally, please list the name of the Attorney-in-Fact under the signature line on the Undertaking. Please use the 'Refile Document' link for Doc. No. 1707 to resubmit the corrected filing. Thank you and have a great day."

Update 04/03/24 3:29 p.m. ET: This story has been updated to include more information.

https://www.newsweek.com/donald-trump-forced-reveal-his-finances-save-his-properties-1886609

Trump's people could have lodged it incorrectly on purpose, maybe under a Trump demand as it does buy him more time, but am feeling, without knowing more, it's likely unfair to see him getting "special treatment" in that particular instant. Seems the court is just following proper procedure.

Thanks.