Agree i don't recall you doing that before, that's why i mentioned it.
Re your question to the board there are obviously as expected different positions on that. Sometimes one is better sometimes the other. Personally i have said before one of the reasons i post whole articles so much is that more paywalls are appearing all the time and i expect many here, posters and readers included, would be blocked by at least some of those paywalls. That aside it's a moderation thing also, isn't it that posters are free to do whatever is most preferred by them on that. I'm sure there are a number of factors involved. Different factors for different people. On computer or phone. Time involved would be important for many. Better left to the poster. Works fine as it is, i think. ;-)
"For sure Mr Fuagf re [...]
[.. if you link back to other articles I've copied I expect you to (mostly or entirely) find it's use! ;]
P - Question for the board. What is the preference - less or more; whole article or as much brevity as possible.
P - Often times I find a whole article worthy, don't expect others to find what I find important and reluctant to bold lines as it is another form of editing.
Also, I like when a whole article is posted cuz saves me following a link and possibly being stymied by a pay wall or worse disastrous encounters.
Just to get the opinions going."