Replies to post #787769 on Fannie Mae-No Politics (FNMA)

[Wise Man]

Last evidence: The Mnuchin Treasury recommended Congress to repeal the statutory definitions of capital adequacy matters, where is set forth, for instance, that the Minimum Leverage Capital requirement is met with Core Capital or Tier 1 Capital, not with "Capital Reserve".

The FHFA removed the column Capital Shortfall to the same end (an adjusted $402B Core Capital shortfall over Minimum Leverage Capital requirement together)
They rather write their own rules.
2019 UST Housing Reform plan:

[NeoSunTzu]

WHY ARE YOU HERE?!!!! I have a gut feeling you are one of the best informed on FnF, the related accounting, and document history, BUT YOU CANNOT MAKE SIMPLE CLEAR POINTS TO SAVE YOUR LIFE.

Dispense with 90% of each of your posts, use bullet points, make isolated straightforward statements, with a few supporting arguments. The rants and raves about multiple identities, the plethora of long twisted paragraphs, and patchwork of copy and pasted documents with all the manic red markups bear a striking resembalnce to the Zodiac k i l l e r.

I'm not sure ANYONE on this board understands what you believe about price, actual capital levels, where they are concerning a timeline to meet requirements for release, or anything else of importance. And you s h * t on every post that on the surface level fights against the thieves in favor or shareholders.