B402, GEE, "appearance of impropriety" oh no, of course no one here either has ever heard of it or understands it --
Not funny you would introduce your post as you did. See
Att: B402, too. [...]I see you totally different from B402 in that you don't pretend to be wiser than others. You don't say you know things that others don't in the way he does. You don't put others down where there is no reasonable rational to do so. You don't place yourself on a pedestal with others on a footstool. https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=173832182
We have already well established the fact that perception of the situation does Dems no favors. Been covered in any number of posts.
Then you have wade who was a Personal Injury lawyer specialized in Traffic (there is name for that)
Maybe it's me, but it seems kind of weird that the defense is protesting that the prosecutor isn't good at his job. Are they insulted that they didn't merit someone with more gravitas?
A historic case where no matter how it ends now and from here out has an [asterisk] next to it
Unpack that for us, Karen. There's a conflict of some sort? (Maybe you guys should hire Ken Starr.)
Adults have relationships. If Fani Willis were fucking every man and woman on her team, it would have no bearing at all on the guilt or innocence of any of the defendants. You should get your mind out of the gutter.
As far as corruption, which doesn't seem to be any avlid part of your argument, you Trumpanzees have a truckload of nerve talking about corruption.