Taking a financial Equity position in a target company is based on the perceived value of the company.
“Your” perceived value can not be of interest even though GMan did specify his post was pointed for the most part, to bashers in his intro.
The perceived value for an equity position would be one that both parties can agree on.
And the negotiations start from there.
What added value does the company offer in owning an equity portion and what affect does that added value have in the negotiations for both / all parties. (Competitive tension)
Just because Stellantis gave us a reason for a PR, Doesn’t mean they’re the only possible equity competitor, which in and of itself would drive the price in negotiations higher.
Even another mining company or two, would have reason to take a large equity position. If they had future ideas about owning the company.
Too much to ponder this early in the morning
Market Data 
Markets 
AI
