That was on November 21st. They clearly said they were going to be drilling twin holes of previously drilled holes at the Red Rock project. Am I being dishonest by quoting a company PR?
In a PR dated Dec. 4th, they said they were drilling on "Pad 1", but said nothing about whether it was a twinned hole or not, in the Red Rock area or in new ground. So, I made the logical assumption that they were doing what they said they were going to do. Why would I assume otherwise?
And then Tracy pipes up, says what I was saying was false (despite relying on a PR which I assume she wrote).....and that they are in new ground. Okay, so based on her statement, they decided not to twin previous holes......? Yes, plans change, but until they announce that change in plans....who would know? Does that post on Ihub by Tracy count as an official release of information? Has Ihub been designated as an official social media for LBSR to release new information?
Either way, I look forward to seeing a PR describing accurately where they drilled, how deep, and maybe some assay/geochem results. I am sure their contracted geologist will sign off on the PR, right? I can't wait for the rare earths, cobalt, and nickel values.....
Market Data 
Markets 
AI
