Replies to post #1095 on Trump Media and Tech Group (Politics Allowed~Non-M

[oystersnbeer]

Jack Smith’s “dramatic new proof” so “overwhelming” reluctant witnesses may decide to flip

Trump “demonstrated a criminal intent" to collaborate with insurrectionists at “expense of the Constitution"

Trump refused to help stop the violent attack on the U.S. Capitol and instead watched TV from the White House, according to previously undisclosed details that special counsel Jack Smith's team uncovered as part of its Jan. 6 probe, ABC News reported.

“Trump was ‘very angry’ that day – not angry at what his supporters were doing to a pillar of American democracy, but steaming that the election was allegedly stolen from him and his supporters, who were ‘angry on his behalf,’” ABC News reported. “Scavino described it all as ‘very unsettling,’” sources told the outlet.

Former Trump aide Nick Luna also shared that when the ex-president was told about Vice President Mike Pence’s need to be moved to a secure location, Trump responded by saying "So what?" Luna perceived this as an “unexpected willingness” on Trump's part to expose a longtime loyalist to potential harm.

“Indeed, Trump’s angry response to Scavino’s comment to him that there’s smoke coming out of the Capitol in effect was, ‘Let it Burn,’” Gershman said. “And his nonchalant indifference to Vice President Pence’s safety and welfare offers chilling proof that Trump’s conscious purpose, namely, his intent, was first to incite an insurrection and then by his inaction to demonstrate his intent that the insurrection effectively stop Congress from doing its constitutional duty to certify the election results.”

https://i.imgur.com/yBGUNtC_d.webp?maxwidth=760&fidelity=grand

[12yearplan]

Well said and yet sublime in it's core obviousness - the fact that it needs to be said at all reveals 'Something is rotten in the state of Denmark'