News Focus
News Focus
icon url

Don Faton

01/02/24 5:21 PM

#68064 RE: Pogwoll #68063

Yep gotta just wait to see what court does then we can all speculate again. Till then this all means nothing
icon url

I-Glow

01/03/24 11:33 AM

#68067 RE: Pogwoll #68063

Calasse has absolutely nothing to do with filing a 15c.

But Calasse has been used for every other reason that Sharp hasn't accomplished anything of value.

"What's funny is to think that a SEC filer with audited financials would have any problem getting a 15c through."

Are you using Calasse as an excuse for not filing a 15c for SRNW or GVSI?

IG
icon url

I-Glow

01/03/24 7:24 PM

#68071 RE: Pogwoll #68063

Sharp filed a Form 10 not a S-1 so it will be extremely difficult to find a MM to file the 15c.

"What's funny is to think that a SEC filer with audited financials would have any problem getting a 15c"

Yoy don't know the difference between a Form 10 and a S-1.

If it so easy why hasn't Sharp filed an 15c for WNFT, SRNW and GVSI it has been over 2 years - there can't be a reverse merger without filing a 15c.

A Form 10 does not register a securities offering or transaction - for a merger a S-1 would be required and deemed effective.

IG