🕺🤸New meeting Introduction: You haven’t advertised the fact of this congregation.🤼🦸
4 proceeded. My questions really relate to finality . 5 MR BELTRAMI: Yes. 👉️6 MR JUSTICE HILDYARD: And in that context, I noticed two 7 things which you may assist me on. The first is that DB 8 is described as an informal representative of other 9 persons interested in the same way, and I take it that 10 there is no issue in that regard, and I can take it that 11 the issue which will have been argued by DB one way or 12 the other will be, in effect , concluded. There might 13 not be a strict issue estoppel but it is very late , 👌you 14 haven’t advertised the fact of this congregation, it 15 should be sufficient .👌 Is there anything I need to be 16 wary of in that respect? 17 MR BELTRAMI: I don’t believe there is. Your Lordship is 18 right that DB’s position has always been not a formal 19 representative of the ECAPS holders. 20 MR JUSTICE HILDYARD: Yes.👈️ 21 MR BELTRAMI: And it has been argued on that basis 22 throughout.