If a trader uses some sort of scanner (such as "Scanz") and who might be among the first to read "good" news released about a ticker and, then, buys in early on the news (and BEFORE the possible MOMO/FOMO that might follow) and, then, starts conveying that news, updates, enthusiasm, etc. to social media what is "wrong" with that? Also, how can such a person predict something like a "deal" falling through and a possible subsequent dip/tanking of the pps after caused by those selling on the "bad" news? (After all, some might be "MOMO" traders and mainly interested in upward movement of the pps but not much of the company's fundamentals. I mean, are you saying that those ("MOMO") traders who might use a scanner program and see news before most everyone else and buy in early and, then, hype the ticker are "guilty" of something?
And how about recent developments over at SP*ZI? Is it really anyone's "fault" for being a "MOMO" trader and taking a chance over there as well?
Just wondering.
GLTA
P.S. It took me a long time to come to the conclusion that both "pumpers" and "bashers" can be "good", but it depends if they are telling the TRUTH.
Market Data 
Markets 
AI
