Replies to post #778060 on Fannie Mae-No Politics (FNMA)

[nagoya1]

You get all the brown emojis as a GSE pref fibbing award.

Your GSE warrant dilution solution deserves the Ronald clown award too.

As for Ackman, saying the contrary to warrants being exercised to his fund holders would put him in hot water.

As for reading a balance sheet, yours contains brown emojis.




FNMA

[trunkmonk]

unlike Ps and commons haters and stalkers, who think commons are worthless or worth 10c, he does know facts and balance sheets, and knows its worth $20, and of course without warrents, $60 to $100. I like the way he thinks, especially when it comes to Harvard President, I love it. the left and hate filled democrats will be eating crow because our day is at hand. In fact ,Joe dont care for Bill much, cause Bill is accomplished and much much smarter than Joe, which is typical left thinking. so GSEs are either Republican or courts.

[Guido2]

I have told you before why, in my opinion, Ackman advocated the exercise of warrants: he wanted to acquire them from the government at a low price. Also (YanksGhost), as long as the warrants remain outstanding, Ackman can acquire upto 20% of the common outstanding shares without having to file any reports. If Ackman comes to this board and advocates exercise of the warrants, he's definitely getting a 💩 from me.

I'll be well on my way to becoming a billionaire if the government does the right thing and ends the fraudulent conservatorship, writes down the SPS, refunds the swindled funds and cancels the warrants. Ackman knows how to read balance sheets. So do I. I know that if Treasury "INVESTS $193 BILLION EQUITY" and then takes $301 billion out of the corporations, Treasury's equity in the corporations no longer exists. What do do think Net Worth Sweep means? It already took away it's equity in the corporations. And much, much more.