All he needs to do is certify the jury verdict. The plaintiffs in other suits will use it to make their cases. The derivative suits will get the overpayments back to the corporations.
We all know that Lamberth does not want to give anything to the shareholders, but he must be consistent with the jury's opinion. The agreements are unfair, unreasonable and they must compensate us for it. I don't know how Lamberth can justify the validity of agreements for which a jury has ruled that are unfair, unreasonable and that in the case Fannie PFD's should receive an annual % for the validity of these agreements that FHFA signed with U.S. Treasury.
Market Data 
Markets 
AI
