You're right. Guess because the focus of the two articles was voters' perception of the economy vs the reality of it, and not the inequality question. That's likely why your elephant was not included. Again, it was because your article .. https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=173305429 .. dealt directly with the inequality question that i said "good one" and why, in my reply, i included the post linking to Hanauer
"The Top 1% of Americans Have Taken $50 trillion From the Bottom 90%—And That's Made the U.S. Less Secure
By Nick Hanauer and David M. Rolf September 14, 2020 9:30 AM EDT
Hanauer is an entrepreneur and a venture capitalist, the founder of the public-policy incubator Civic Ventures, and the host of the podcast Pitchfork Economics. Rolf is Founder and President Emeritus of SEIU 775 and the author of The Fight for Fifteen (New Press, 2016)
Like many of the virus’s hardest hit victims, the United States went into the COVID-19 pandemic wracked by preexisting conditions. A fraying public health infrastructure, inadequate medical supplies, an employer-based health insurance system perversely unsuited to the moment—these and other afflictions are surely contributing to the death toll. But in addressing the causes and consequences of this pandemic—and its cruelly uneven impact—the elephant in the room is extreme income inequality.
Ok, i posted a reference to it earlier .. The wealthiest 1% has taken $50 trillion from working Americans and redistributed it, a new study finds. Here's what that means. Beware, fellow plutocrats, the pitchforks are coming | Nick Hanauer "It’s Time to Stop Living the American Scam""" Inequality is a huge problem worldwide. And becoming more of a problem in Australia too. Note also Business Insider isn't exactly left-wing. Paul Constant Sep 18, 2020, 11:05 PM https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=169922918 .
Market Data 
Markets 
AI
