News Focus
News Focus
icon url

HoldEm777

11/08/23 1:18 PM

#91189 RE: stervc #91169

Thanks for the reply. I understand that’s how you see it. My reasoning ultimately does not matter but I had directly asked the specific questions prior to challenge the word salad they had given and it got flat out avoided. Then…. They drop the tweet saying the deal was done and 8k to come. Well I ate crow because I assumed my initial thoughts were over reaction. Just to have them drop a 8k stating nothing was complete.

Answer this when time allows please.

The 8k was to be issued 4days after close which they stated. Well if nothing closed then why even issue a 8k?
But to go one step farther, why take to Twitter and broadcast the date they claimed the deal was done and when the 4th day would be?
So technically they had 4days to figure out nothing closed….
But don’t you think that’s why they dodged the questions to start with?

I understand that you can not publicly agree with me but you seem fair so I will rest knowing you at least fully understand my reasoning.

Thanks again
icon url

HoldEm777

11/08/23 1:25 PM

#91190 RE: stervc #91169

Last question… in your opinion since it was not strategic or planned who do you think is dumping now?
Cause it looks like the Big “D” but I’m sure you will not agree with that either
icon url

fly_fisherman

11/08/23 5:50 PM

#91261 RE: stervc #91169

Just a what-if....


Stervc is there any way they can come back and just say Merger Acquisition-COMPLETED?

Forget all the static in between imho. I have seen many company's play the PR/Twitter game responding to everything question and demand for action.

Management here seems to respond when there is something to say materially. That means a whole lot imho.

I just have a feeling there is more under the hood causing this to drag out a bit. What do you think? I added today.
Bullish
Bullish