Replies to post #18635 on NetList Inc (NLST)

[100lbStriper]

hey justis whats up, right now i'm at the point where i dont need to learn any more tec stuff so i cant answer your question, sorry man. alls i do is try to understand the jist of the court documents in laymens terms to understand the level of guilt there going to have to pay for. stuff like that i could give you an answer to though. right now scam and micron just lost the jan jury trial and will owe big, thats a given and no one on this board with any sense is going to challenge what i just said.

ps.... the what if this crazy shit, or that happens doesnt count. its the waiting that sux. there ready to try this case in 5 minutes or 5 days you'll still get the same result in jan 24.

[Jetmek_03052]

From the court testimony:

"Mr. Holbrook’s testimony contradicts Petitioner’s argument that a “rank can include one memory device because, as Mr. Holbrook testified, a “rank is defined as a group that comprises a full 64-bit data bus,” and there were no 64-bit memory devices at the time and still today. EX2062, ¶ 247. Thus, in order to provide data across the full 64-bit data bus, more than one memory device is necessarily required to form a “rank.”

Holbrook's testimony defined "a rank as a group that comprises a full 64 Bit data bus". At the time of that testimony and even today, there are no single units that can supply data to a 64-bit data bus.

So as I read it, Netlists contention is that there CANNOT BE a single unit supplying all 64-bits. There HAS to be more than one unit to get to the 64-bit level.