Replies to post #40039 on SiNtx Technologies Inc (SINT)

[joev2]

Oh, really?

Your over the top response only adds credence to my assertion that this was in fact planned. You appear to not want people to consider this as you point in other directions to distract from this subject.

The simple (well maybe not for you) reason I don't want people to invest here is because it's an investment disaster! All one needs to do is spend 5 seconds looking at the graph. But besides that, let me address the rest of your 'sound reasoning'.

Theres been nothing to justify the continued drop of the price especially considering increasing revenue and sources of revenue.

So, let's take company 'A' and there's plenty like them.....And so company 'A' makes 100k while spending 300k. "Let's increase business", so they say. And so now they hire consultants, spend a lot on ramping up the advertisements etc, and the following year, their 'revenue' increases to 1 million, while expenses increase to 10 million. "No problem" say they. "Let's ramp it up some more!" And so the following year and years, they keep the business juicing up with sales of 50 million, expenses 500 million. Get the pattern? I didn't think so. So, I'll tell you. There's a lot more than just having a product that can be of use or can be sold. We're talking about margins, smart management and a business plan. Sint misses and they're one of the worst I've ever seen! Hands down, the WORST IF legitimate. Of course that's just my own personal perspective. Again, a 5 second look at the yearly chart should settle it for anyone with common sense. But then again, 'it's not a lie if you believe it', so says Georgie C.

Hey, you're starting to rub off on me. I'm becoming more and more convinced YOU'RE the one playing the games. Hope Sonny is paying you off well. It's people like you who have influenced a lot of the losses to keep Sonny living well. Look at my earliest posts. I actually thought you were legit! My bad....and my apologies to the rest for my brief lack of discernment, way back.

[Entlarvt]

The company SINT (AMDA) has been a source of concern for investors due to allegations of dishonest practices, including misrepresentation and misappropriation of investor funds. Despite these allegations, regulatory oversight, notably by the SEC, appears to have allowed these activities to persist over a period of several years.

Moreover, there is a prevailing sentiment among investors that another reverse stock split (RS) may be imminent, potentially leading to further financial losses for those who have placed their trust in the company's assurances.

It is essential to highlight concerns about the company's leadership, particularly Sonny Bal, whose credibility has come under scrutiny in this context. I strongly advise against considering an investment in this company for any reason.

The lingering question remains: why has regulatory action not been taken to address these ongoing issues? It is disconcerting to note that such alleged practices have persisted since 2015.

On a separate note, it is worth acknowledging the positive development of posting limits being instituted here and on the Tesla board. This measure is expected to curtail the proliferation of conspiracy theories and foster more focused discussions on stock-related matters.