Are you watching for RE-ENTRY @ $0.0002 again? Looks like ANOTHER 60% HAIRCUT from $0.0005's?
Also, why do you think those who SOLD the $0.001x price didn't RE-BUY?
Are they EXPECTING Mark to R/S again or waiting for lower you think?
Just curious... wadi said 40 people holding ~50M pretty tightly held...
[] Were you one of his "40 people"? [] Claims he "hasn't sold a share"?
[] That MATH doesn't add up. English is not my first or second language - I don't claim to speak, or communicate WELL in it. [] HOWEVER,... MATH I understand. Help me with this MATH problem:
PROBLEM #2: How can ANYONE say a float is "pretty tightly held" while ~750M shares & MORE are COMING RAINING down it seems since PC open high of $0.0014?
[] Retail DOES NOT have the ability to put in 5-digit trades [] MM/Broker MANIPULATING the price UP to normalize & [] Try to create UPWARD DEMAND [] &/or BID SUPPORT [] TO SELL INTO... [] AFTER DECIMATING the bids the past few days... [] = CLEARLY they have MANY MORE SHARES to SELL here!
2,000 shares @ $0.00045 = a whopping $0.90 (ninety cents) worth of shares 4,000 shares @ $0.00045 = a whopping $1.80 worth of shares
[] NO RETAIL can put in such an order [] Nor would logically WANT to since OTC trades typically cost $4-$9/transaction [] So who PAYS $5.00 for example, for $0.90 worth of shares?
[] Which would put the ACTUAL COST of shares @ ~$0.003 (10x current cost) [] And @ $9.95 + $0.90 = $0.005425 [] ANSWER = for many reasons: NOT RETAIL!!
We saw THE SAME EXACT thing with 100 & 200 share-trades @SAME PRICE YESTERDAY!
I won't even bore anyone with the math, but that's a FACTOR OF 20x & 10x MORE EXPENSIVE!