InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

TenKay

09/09/23 12:48 PM

#65649 RE: Jagman5 #65647

Yeah, I don’t know what their calculus was in doing only a 1:9. Did they want the ability to do another later that would blow past the 1:250 limit? Did they think the naked shorty lawsuit would propel them past a dollar? Did Michery realize he was going to have to dilute a lot more in the next two years and wanted to keep one last RS on the table? Did Nasdaq refuse to process an RS that brought the total past 1:250?

Who knows. It doesn’t make much sense.