Imbass: I was not trying to mislead anyone. I don't consider what you are calling products to be products. Were they real products that did what was claimed they do?
To be less misunderstood, I should have said "effective products," "products that actually do what they claim to do" or something of that ilk.
The company has real products, not crap that doesn't do what it claims.
Now, please go back through my posts carefully to see where I stand on this company, because as every long on this board will tell you, I really distrust everything about Jim and company.
It has real products that really work. Is that enough for this company to recover from this mess? Who knows, but it won't be easy.
Market Data 
Markets 
AI
