News Focus
News Focus
icon url

Yolo

07/25/23 8:37 AM

#65838 RE: MrSmith18 #65833

This is the insanity I am referring to:

The question one should be asking is why were the judges willing to ignore a legal technicality to avoid ruling on this case. Also, why was this case pushed out for as long as it was when it appeared to be a quick and straightforward ruling. It took the judges months rather than the expected weeks to rule. ...and other cases that came after ours were decided upon prior.

These facts too may be revealing and may tell us something about their true intentions. My guess is that the judges will prolong this case indefinitely to avoid having to set a new precedent for whatever reason that may be important to them. We may never know for sure but their behavior speaks volumes.




No Supreme Court Justice will do anything you've claimed, it is so far beneath them. But definitely enlightening that you think it would be acceptable.
icon url

Brucebannerr

07/25/23 5:59 PM

#65845 RE: MrSmith18 #65833

Still waiting on whos tracking these naked shorts ? You seem to be an authority on the subject.

The naked short trades that took place in early July of last year will tell us more of who was funding and advising Callesse. That spotlight will very likely unveil even more dirt.


Also curious on how you can sell millions of fake shares and still close the trade . Is George's transfer agent corrupt ?