1- There were no publications going on for 2.5 months after you claimed they were. I was correctly pointing that out, and correctly pointed out that he had to start publications by end of June or he'd miss the deadline.
I didn't notice the publications for three days, not three weeks. Meanwhile you insisted that everything would be wrapped up by May! That's a much better example of being completely wrong.
2- Sharp didn't include the 20M shares in the annual report. Therefore, I correctly stated that either he sold them or needed to file a revised report, which he did. Thank you for pointing out one of the many instances where I was proven correct by Sharp himself!
3- I never said Calasse beat Sharp, I said that ultimately he will. You're the one that erroneously claimed that Sharp had already won!
You like to make things up completely, which works if anyone doesn't check in frequently enough to know you're full of bullshit.
Market Data 
Markets 
AI
