The problem is, despite your focus toward those who cast doubts on this stock, you have provided in this post nothing substantial to alleviate that doubt.
Most of us know the company is 'real'. That's not really the issue. What we don't know is whether the SEC has found the company fraudulent in regard to press releases related to a 25 million dollar government contract. We also have serious doubts regarding the available float.
If you have evidence that suggests the SEC is wrong, then it would be wise to post that evidence. Otherwise, the claim of buying up more shares represents nothing substantial. Most people have seen people post on these boards they are buying after a significant problem with a stock, only to find out much later they were selling into those same claims. I'm not accusing you of this tactic, just stating a reality we all deal with on these boards.
If I had visited the company and found substantial positive information, the first thing I would want to do is share it publicly, especially during a time when the stock was down nearly 50% for the day. The fact that visitors have decided to remain clandestine in their coverage of the company, only adds fuel to the short fire burning our shares into worthless kindle.
Market Data 
Markets 
AI
