Load of crap. No president running for reelection wants to see a primary challenge. That applied to Trump no less than Biden. Trump was not seriously challenged and thus far there is no serious challenger to Biden.
Do you see anyone on the GOP side who is appealing to both the GOP Party voters AND the wider electorate? I don't. Christy is the only one eviscerating Trump at the moment. The rest of the field is too craven to appeal to anyone but the Trump voters.
Dems have problems too when they will not support a true primary system because everyone need to bend their knee to Biden. And the Marxist wing of the Democrat Party push back.
conix, The only amusing thing going on here is your continued superficial treating of all things political. No, of all things period. You could well have introduced Cornel West there for the reason i gave. If you didn't you didn't think of it, still i reckon you boosted him for that reason. Now after boosting him as a 3rd party candidate you denigrate him by saying he is a committed Marxist. Without a link to verify that, noted. Not that you would know any better but being a committed Marxist, if he is, should not be seen as a bad thing. In itself it would only be by ignorant brainwashed water sliders as you.
West is a guy who takes an interest in humanity. Something you, with virtually every post, clearly show you take very little, if any, interest in. Read and learn:
Cornel West and Marxist Humanism Christian Fuchs University of Westminster, UK
Abstract
Humanity has experienced an explosion of anti-humanism in the form of authoritarian capitalism, postmodern filter bubbles, and global problems. Marxist/Socialist Humanism is the proper answer to the deep crisis of humanity. In this context, this article asks ‘How can Cornel West’s works inform a contemporary Marxist humanist theory of society?’ Taking West’s works as a starting point, what are the key elements of a Marxist humanist theory of society?
Cornel West is one of the leading critical intellectuals today. His work has fused anti-racist theory, Black Liberation Theology, Marxist theory, pragmatism, and existentialism.
This article especially focuses on West’s understanding of humanism and culture. It shows how his works and praxis can inform the reinvigoration of Marxist Humanism in the age of authoritarian capitalism as a socialist response. West’s thought can and should also inform the analysis of alienation, exploitation, domination, culture, the public sphere, the critique of ideology, and popular culture.
This article asks and tries to answer the following questions: How can Cornel West’s works inform ary Marxist humanist theory of society? Taking West’s works as a starting point, what are the key elements of a Marxist humanist theory of society?
The approach this article takes is theoretical in nature. It develops theory and contributes to sociological theory and critical theories of society. It does not involve empirical, data-focused research. It engages with key works of Cornel West, sets them into the context of Marxist Humanism, and takes West’s writings as a starting point for an update of Marxist humanist theory. The discussion of West’s theory and the update of Marxist Humanism inspired by West focus on key aspects of Marxist humanist theory – namely alienation, organic intellectuality, praxis, culture, and the critique of ideology.
--- Corresponding author: Christian Fuchs, Communication and Media Research Institute, University of Westminster, Watford Road, Northwick Park, Harrow, HA1 3TP, UK. Email: christian.fuchs@triple-c.at 988314CRS0010.1177/0896920520988314Critical SociologyFuchs research-article2021 Article 1220 Critical Sociology 47(7-8) ---
Two key concepts that underlie the present article are humanism and Marxist Humanism. We therefore have to first ask: What is humanism? What is Marxist Humanism?
Humanism is a particular philosophical tradition and worldview that focuses on the human being as central moment of society; ‘“humanism” established itself in the late nineteenth century as an umbrella term for any disposition of thought stressing the centrality of “Man” or the human’ (Soper, 1991: 187). Humanism ‘places human beings, as opposed to God, at the center of the uni-verse. [. . .] [It is based on the] conviction that human destiny is entirely in human hands’ (Kraye, 2005: 477).
--- At its broadest, “humanism” means little more than a system of thought in which human values, interests, and dignity are considered particularly important. [. . .] Humanism’s focus is on the “big questions”, for example of what ultimately is real; of what ultimately makes life worth living; of what is morally right or wrong, and why; and of how best to order our society. (Law, 2011: 1, 6) ---
Synthesising these understandings, we can define humanism as a philosophical tradition and worldview that considers the human being as the central aspect of society; takes the human being as starting point for theory, ethics and politics; asks and deals with big questions about the human being’s role in society such as what the good life of humans in society is and how it can be achieved.
Luik (1998) identifies four philosophical forms of modern humanism: Marxist Humanism, pragmatist humanism, existentialist humanism, and Heideggerian humanism. Marxist Humanism is a form of humanism. It is a particular type and approach of critical social theory that is informed by Karl Marx’s works. Its representatives include, for example, Raya Dunayevskaya, Paulo Freire, Erich Fromm, CLR James, Henri Lefebvre, Georg Lukács, Herbert Marcuse, MN Roy, EP Thompson, and Raymond Williams (see the contributions in Fromm, 1965 and Alderson and Spencer, 2017 for an introduction). Key features of Marxist humanist theory are a strong influence by Hegel’s dialectical philosophy and Marx’s philosophical writings such as the Economic and Philosophic Manuscripts of 1844; the stress of the importance of practices, praxis, and class struggles in class societies; the use and further development of Marx’s notion of alienation; and the development of a theory and philosophy of praxis where theorists act as organic intellectuals who inform struggles for democratic socialism and socialist democracy (Fuchs, 2020a, 2020b, 2021).
Soper (1991: 188) provides the following characterisation of Marxist Humanism:
--- Marxist and socialist humanists have wanted to respect the “dialectic” between human agency and the circumstances in which it is exercised, but there has been a certain polarization in their argument: the existentialist approach has placed an emphasis on consciousness which is difficult to reconcile with the idea of ‘unwilled’ social forces whilst the Hegelian-Lukácsian school has emphasized the loss of humanity inflicted by generalized processes of reification and alienation, though perhaps at the cost of making them appear inescapable. In contrast to both these positions, structuralist and ‘post-structuralist’ anti-humanists either insist on the subordination of individuals to economic structures, codes and regulating forces (modes of production, kinship systems, the Unconscious, etc.) or attempt to ‘deconstruct’ the very idea of a “human meaning” prior to the discourse and cultural systems whose qualities it is supposed to explain.
Anti-humanists can, on the one hand, be found in the structuralist-Marxist theory tradition. Its representatives include, for example, Edward Bernstein, Karl Kautsky, Henryk Grossmann, Louis Althusser, Étienne Balibar, Nicos Poulantzas, Ralph Miliband, Galvano della Volpe, Lucio Colletti, Alain Badiou, and Jacques Rancière. On the other hand, postmodern and post-structuralist thought is anti-humanist. Examples are the approaches of Roland Barthes, Jean Baudrillard, Judith Butler, Gilles Deleuze, Jacques Derrida, Michel Foucault, Félix Guattari, Julia Kristeva, Ernesto Laclau, Jean-François Lyotard, Chantal Mouffe, and Bernard Stiegler. The common Fuchs 1221 feature of anti-humanism is the structuralist assumption that not human beings and their practices are central in society, but structures that act on and constrain humans who are mere bearers and executors of structures.
Returning to the abovementioned definition of humanism, we can define Marxist Humanism as a philosophical tradition and worldview inspired by Marx that considers the human being as the central aspect of society; takes the human being as a starting point for the theoretical and practical analysis and critique of alienation, capitalism and class society; puts an emphasis on human practices and class struggles; and sees democratic socialism as the good society that enables a good life for all humans. For example, Marx (1852: 103) gave a humanist analysis of class struggle when he said that humans ‘make their own history, but they do not make it just as they please; they do not make it under circumstances chosen by themselves, but under circumstances directly encountered, given and transmitted from the past’. The point here is that structures condition class struggles but that significant social change in class societies can only be achieved when the exploited unite and collectively organise and struggle.
Humanity has experienced an explosion of anti-humanism (Fuchs, 2020a, 2020b, 2021) in three forms:
(a) In many countries, there has been the rise of authoritarian governments, leaders, parties, and movements that threaten democracy and appeal to citizens who feel disenfranchised by capitalism by nationalism, racism, and demagoguery.
(b) Postmodern culture has put so much stress on and fetishized difference that we have experienced the rise of filter bubbles that disable humans to see, put a stress on and talk about commonalities.
(c) Global problems such as global inequalities, the global environmental crisis, the coronavirus crisis, and violent global conflicts threaten the survival of humanity.
Taken together, these factors have contributed to a crisis of the human being and society. The imminent danger is that violence and global problems escalate and that humanity is destroyed. The renewal of humanism is a proper political answer to this danger. Marxist Humanism stresses that democratic socialism is the proper alternative to the social formation that created global problems that threaten the survival of humanity.
West is one of the leading critical intellectuals today.
conix, You denigrate West by saying he is a committed Marxist, and you don't even afford him some credit by supporting that assertion of yours by providing a supportive link. In that you again insult the board. You don't even give him credit for being the decent guy he obviously is.
You do to him what you disingenuously accuse this board of doing to you. You put West down because you disagree with all he stands for without even knowing what he stands for.
As you have also been told repeatedly by others here, you cop criticism for the substance of your opinions. Not simply because we disagree with you.
Market Data 
Markets 
AI
