Barron on statute of limitations per conversation below. He said 6 years from 2019…
Rodney5 Re: Barron4664 post# 753019 Thursday, 05/11/2023 1:31:34 PM Barron, you mentioned 2019 letter agreement.
The last letter agreement was January 14, 2021. Did the time clock start in 2019 or 2021? Thanks
Quote: "I have 6 years from the material change to the LP as agreed in 2019 to challenge the commitment in district court under the little tucker act. There doesnt seem to be a reason not to also challenge the original PSPA agreement just for the sake of arguing based on the supreme 9-0 ruling. Just a couple extra paragraphs, doesnt matter, as The Justice Departments policy on statute of limitations is valid since under their policy, the 2019 letter agreement creates a new injury. No one to my knowledge has challenged Treasury on the Charter Act yet, hoping for some traction there." End of Quote
Barron4664 05/12/23 12:03 PM #755063 RE: Rodney5 #754986 Hi Rodney,
I used the 2019 agreement because it was a fundamental change from the NWS to an increase in LP for free. It is a new form of the same insult. I dont remember what the 2021 letter agreement entailed. I assume it was a further clarification of the 2019 agreement.
I have been spending some time researching the issues around Oaths of Office. See my last few posts. I think I would like to begin drafting a claim sometime around 2nd half of July. I would like to file in district Court for illegal exaction based on the Actions of Treasury under the Little Tucker Act. I would like to see what happens in DC with the Writ of Quo Warranto. I would probably file a motion for a Writ of Quo Warranto for the FHFA and Treasury officials involved in the conservatorship going back to 2008. I don’t know that the Statute of Limitations would apply for criminal acts. If you would like to collaborate with me let me know. I dont have Private messaging here.
News 
Market Data 
Discover 
AI
