Replies to post #118496 on Voip Pal Com Inc (VPLM)

[loophole lawyer]

In my useless, meaningless, worthless opinion….. an officer of the court ( attorney), does not get a “stay” from a judge until another court has an outcome, have several conferences with chief in-house council of the largest corporations in the world ( Google, Facebook), have a settlement with one of the largest corporations in the world ( Amazon), and then turn to their client ( VoIP-Pal), and advise to walk away from California Court empty handed. They knew about Alice long ago and had multi- hour conference calls with Google and Facebook and we are to believe that AFTER hours of conference calls and a settlement with Amazon, Hudnell advises to forget California…… Think “Stipulation”……remember, I know less than nothing!

[rapz]

Good point! Mr. Hudnell in Mountain View, CA, should have known NDCal local rules promoting Alice rule to dismiss all patent cases filed against Silicon Valley infringers. He went all the way to stand in the queue for the Supreme Court schedule but lost to the American Axle.

At the same time he also circumvented the "rotten" NDCal by going to Waco and "locking in" Judge Albright, a person being sought after by many patent holders.

By the way, leaving the NDCal for now may be a temporary strategy. If AMZN case settles SUCCESSFULLY for both MG and RBR patent infringements (10 claims, 8 claims, etc.) what happens to the Alice rule argument promoted by NDCal?

In the patent world, we need only a single claim to sue for infringement and win. VPLM has 100's of claims in each patent.

If the success extends to TMUS and VZ cases in Waco, will they revisit cases in NDCal after having confirmed in Waco the non-issue of Alice rule? Food for thought to Emil's successor?