Replies to post #118365 on Voip Pal Com Inc (VPLM)

[DeerBalls]

Didn't notice it yesterday, but @ 1PM Eastern, there was a large spike in VPLM volume, which could have suggested "surprise", as I call it. My GUESS is this was about the time of the filing. I like to look back for volume spikes surrounding an event!

All good, thanks again!

Oh, and the big calls for PRs? Lol. The PR comes and we are down a bit! And, the PR is GREAT! VPLM'S NOT DOING IT RIGHT! But, they are!

[rapz]

drumming,
More about NDCal case dismissals. Consider risk minimization strategy. We have known NDCal and its rotten local rules encourage the application of Alice rule to invalidate patents for non-obviousness. Silicon Valley companies are free to infringe patents without accountability.

Donato does not seem to "think independently" about IP on his own. If Silicon Valley companies use NDCal to cancel all patents they infringe and invalidate patents using the Alice rule, these patents get "tarnished". They go through Appeals and other courts, being cited for rejection based on Alice rule. Patent holders have to spend years to argue out of the Alice rule, in courts to revive the patent's viability again. Even SCOTUS has no clue or a solution. Check their ruling on the American Axle case. They goofed! It is better to get out of NDCal "untarnished" and pursue cases in Waco where the judge knows patents unlike NDCal's clueless judges. jmo.