The rig was shipped via ocean freight that took 5 weeks to get to China..so your theory that they had tight security on a slow boat to China because a friend of friend said so is pretty much just wishful thinking but the bigger issue is what happen to the test? Company had no problem promoting this China venture but once it outlived its usefulness for moving paper it vanished from the discussion. Just like all the other gimmicks not ready for prime time they have tried to pitch for last 20 years?
If you have proof they returned it other than to say it sitting in front of Tomball ( that been taken down a year ago) then show me the 8k of the test results and the reason why they returned it? Hmmmm
I can remember the days of the first China testing
And that considerable effort was given to the security of the AOT - at a shareholder meeting in London, there was talk of QS/ STWA people sleeping in the same room / place
“The contention that the Chinese could have reverse engineered the AOT and been using it if it had any value is also unfounded. I have personally spoken many times to the individual that provided security for the AOT on its way over to China, while it was there and on its way back. Security was 24/7.”
Rig was shipped in by a slow boat to China that took 5 weeks. Then the magic pipe sat there while they made up some none-sense about testing it at a different site then originally planned. Lots of opportunity by Chinese industrial spies to examine disassemble X-ray or whatever non destructive method they wanted to use…so restating hearsay that security was 24/7 is just another management tactic to placate there investors..then the testing team and management arrives weeks later but I guess they hired the best security the CCP could provide. Lol!
After the test- there is no word of success adoptions -nothing. Please post where it says Aot 1.x was shipped back and show the board the reason why it was not adopted. Most logical people assume no news is bad news when it comes to the otc! Here it’s just plain toxic!
I 100% concur with you AISI, as I too spoke to the company and that same individual you are referring to who provided 24 hour round the clock security on the AOT while it was in China. It was also widely talked about at the shareholder meeting I attended in the United States that there was round the clock security.
In general there is a lot of hate directed at this stock. To me in a way it confirms that QSEP has something that has the potential to be very valuable should the tech be confirmed.
I am very bullish on these shares right now having come back down from .15 and I have been buying. I have spoken to many people and I honestly have no doubt the AOT works. I have no doubt that large oil companies will buy many units should QSEP get any sort of sales contract or partnership for the AOT. There is solid evidence to support the potential demand which I have listed here many times.
QSEP got to $2.00 on mere speculation of a sales contract with TransCanada. If QSEP sells just one unit the shares are extremely undervalued as one unit will ultimately equal large sales contracts. A field test or partnership with a signed contract will instantly make these shares more valuable. I think Cecil can get all of this done and my confidence in him is high. He has already gotten QSEP far with a potential partnership and LOI pending. AOT has gotten excellent viscosity reduction readings on previous tests. I think Gallagher has made the right improvements and corrections so that the next time AOT is on a line it will hit the ball out of the park.
Market Data 
Markets 
AI
