There is nothing for me to suck up. 'Follow the money' has been overused, become a cliché, lost it's currency, so to speak. And there is no paradox in my statement that higher marginal tax rates have been associated with more income equality and broader economic prosperity.
Is 'follow the money' too simplistic?
ChatGPT
Yes, the phrase "follow the money" can be considered somewhat simplistic when it comes to understanding political disputes and complex situations. While examining financial interests and transactions can provide valuable insights, it is not the sole determinant of political dynamics.
Political disputes often involve a multitude of factors, such as ideology, public opinion, historical context, power dynamics, institutional structures, legal frameworks, and cultural influences. Focusing solely on financial aspects may overlook or oversimplify these other significant factors that shape political decisions and actions.
Furthermore, political disputes are not always driven solely by monetary motivations. Moral convictions, social values, strategic considerations, and personal beliefs also play a crucial role in shaping political stances and conflicts.
While following the money can help uncover financial incentives and potential conflicts of interest, it is essential to consider a broader range of factors to gain a comprehensive understanding of political disputes. Adopting a more nuanced and multidimensional approach that takes into account the complexities of the situation will provide a more accurate and complete analysis.
Market Data 
Markets 
AI
