It is not “one voice” as you believe.
Maybe you don’t understand peer review or how science and scientist actually work.
Conjecture and conspiracy theorists not grounded in peer reviewable results are not just another “voice” compared to peer reviewed science, as you believe, they are just noise, like monkeys screaming in fear of the wind in the trees.
Verifiable facts and a whole bunch of “what ifs” and “maybes” are not the same.
It seems like I am trying to convince someone who thinks science is like religion, it requires belief to think it is true.
They are vastly different.
Religion requires belief in something that cannot be externally verified and proved.
Science requires external verification, proof, and peer review where many other “voices” try to prove the first “voice” right or wrong.
Market Data 
Markets 
AI
