Replies to post #71362 on Sun Pacific Holding Corp (SNPW)

[wallstreet1231]

I disagree. SNPW filed a 14c for a reverse split and then they tweeted that they did not need it etc. Why put such a cloud over investors heads if they really didn't need one. You think this was in the best interest of shareholders, I don't. How many potential shareholders did this distract from buying shares?

Further, take a look at SNPW's history with reverse split filings. In short, this is what has happened over the last three years.

A 14c was filed for a reverse. An 8k was filed for a 1,000 reverse split. An 8k was filed cancelling the prior 8k. A new 14c was filed. Snpw tweeted they really didn't need a reverse. !4c stayed open for another 9 months before it was cancelled. Guess how many months out of the last three years either a 14c or 8k was filed and active concerning a reverse.

My opinions.

[Trooperstocks]

$SNPW #Solar Power -Based on an Energy Information Administration (EIA) data report from January 2023, California again led the way in solar power generation, producing 28.7% of the U.S. total of 12,157 thousand megawatt-hours. Next was Texas with 13.7%, Florida with 9.2%, then Arizona with 5.7%. Possibly more surprising, North Carolina came in fifth with 5.4%.

https://www.thomasnet.com/insights/what-is-solar-energy/