Replies to post #106370 on Cyberfuels Holding Company Inc (CBRF)

[lighter than AIR]

Sorry…you’re barking up the wrong tree…this company is as real as it gets…as you’re about to witness.

And oh, btw…still waiting to hear more about that ECSL “pump and dump boiler room” you visited the other day…you remember…where you “knew half the guys running this scam…all criminals with criminal backgrounds using fake names”….

L….M….F….A….O

Do keep trying. It’s very entertaining.

[Stockman63]

Are you for Real Pennyking? You are downright hilarious in your accusations. Since when does a boiler room do a 1 year study with a Police Dept running on their methanol fuel and document it. There are many on this board that have tried the fuel in their own cars and are aware of the Police Dept. trial. This company is the real deal!

[Amigo Mike]

LOL,

Been reading your notes on ECSL with interest. However your declarations of what's going on with ECSL are backed up with just as much hot air as the bullish case for ECSL.

Agree Ron Mills is selling ECSL stock at discounts to fund the company that doesn't do much at this moment and really never has.

You have evidence of Mills lifestyle and all ? The 144 holding period is not 18 months either ... factually inaccurate. I'll leave that one for you to find

And no, you don't have to find a shady transfer agent to convert stock into tradeable stock. Factually inaccurate as well. ECSL transfer agent can remove the legend .... but even that isn't required in some cases. But in today's world a broker isn't going to accept stinky pinky stock cert with restricted legend and no filings. So owner would send it to ECSL transfer agent to have new cert issued without legend. It isn't complicated.

Boiler room .... um ... the trading volume of ECSL speaks for itself. Next .....

Yes this stock does have manipulation. That is a product of a rabid bullish group of investors working together while also making outlandish public remarks extoling the riches to be gained here. In some cases outright lies. Those are fun to bookmark for later.

Today, there isn't really much of a company. Agreed ... 40% of a gas station and some additive sales .... not much to speak off. We'll see if that changes.

Sadly I don't take trading advice when it includes multiple factually inaccurate basic statements and of course provides no evidence that any of it is occurring. I konw the risk I am taking owning this stock. But that is the beauty of the anonymous internet.

I think there are many here who believe Mills is incompetent and especially so as it relates to a petroleum business. Do I have proof ? No ... but a decade of mistruths and lack of delivery pretty much spells it out. That doesn't mean that Mills can't complete a deal to buy land to support a fuel terminal project. The roadmap for that already existed for Florida and isn't new. That I do have evidence of. Doesn't mean that it can't be done.

Anyway ... bring the facts .... not the bull.
Amigo Mike