Replies to post #154873 on Tautachrome Inc (TTCM)

[Dragon Lady]

LMAO UTTER BS,

Please point out where it states that LaMountain was being "investigated." The lawsuit brought was against a guy named Kistler. No lawsuit against LaMountain. Only a motion that was filed to quash a subpoena.

Uh....a SUBPOENA "BY DEFINITION" = AN INVESTIGATION LMAO WTF ???????

A "Subpoena duces tecum" =
A DEMAND and now per the case as filed on PACER backed by a judge/court order (vs merely an attorney subpoena which do not carry near the weight of a judge backed subpoena !)..an ORDER.. to produce "documents" which in the "modern world" can mean anything from paper to txt messages to phone records to any/all communications of any form...etc.... (it's Latin) !!

A "Subpoena" issued naming a person is a order to "appear" (usually at a law office or police station or office of THE SEC in this case etc).... and be DEPOSED by attorneys and to do so ....under oath while being recorded via video and a court reporter present etc.. LOL :))

Gotta get the basics of "THE LAW" and how it "works" correct... when stating disinformation about same :))

https://www.pacermonitor.com/public/case/26578939/LaMountain_v_United_States_Securities_and_Exchange_Commission

NOTICE: Read the PACER docket....LaMountain LOST HIS "MOTION TO QUASH" which means "THE SEC" got their ability "court backed" in order to subpoena info they wanted from him =
ON-GOING AND WIDE OPEN FORMAL INVESTIGATION IS "LIVE" was we speak !!