While this J Ward states his study is an interpretation, I see a closed final assumption in these two paragraphs. "Need only assume" and "we know today it isn't?" Plus the fact that I was referencing known energy forms that exist and NOT emotions or brain cross wiring.
I'm not that closed minded nor expert or confident enough to claim something isn't as it seems. And I'm also not calling it paranormal.
There is always exceptions to the norm and since we're human we are not exact drones to each other.
Obviously this study considers auras as non existent and an internal quirk.
“Rather than assuming that people give off auras or energy fields that can only be detected by rigged cameras or trained seers, we need only assume that the phenomenon of synaesthesia is taking place.”
"I always came back to the eye and what it could see. I was never able to find any research suggesting any human eye could see an aura resulting from energy you describe. That's not to say it is definitively impossible, just on what we know today it isn't."
Market Data 
Markets 
AI
