Replies to post #441415 on Tornado Alley (PROG)

[B402]

indeed I did, just like I have to repost back at you over and over with my full posts as you purposely leave things out, post things out of context or dig up some confirmation bias when I post data and non partisan research......People do see that, ya know... So, Thats just so much Bull,,,,,,,

Dems used to just fight for their causes, now they've pick up the fallacy game from the repubs and think no one notices....(making them look just as bad)

Im sure anyone can use their search if they are so inclined , but I'm not going to bother, I've had to correct you too many times......Its no time for justification games and dems can't stop long enough to get a grasp on things.......Like the repubs were the only one in power over the last 50yrs,,,,,,The only ones too..................................(I'd recommend the key word Clinton or Bush)

Things like this prove you are only interested in political narrative and that's when it's easy to say 'both sides' are fn idiots

[blackhawks]

I forgot the link to the vote:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/North_American_Free_Trade_Agreement#:~:text=The%20agreement's%20supporters%20included%20132,34%20Republicans%20and%2027%20Democrats.

The agreement's supporters included 132 Republicans and 102 Democrats. The bill passed the Senate on November 20, 1993, 61–38.[21] Senate supporters were 34 Republicans and 27 Democrats. Republican Representative David Dreier of California, a strong proponent of NAFTA since the Reagan Administration, played a leading role in mobilizing support for the agreement among Republicans in Congress and across the country.[22][23]

Chicago Congressman Luis Gutiérrez in particular was a vocal opponent of NAFTA, ultimately voting against the measure because of what he considered its failure to sufficiently provide for displaced worker retraining, protections against American job loss, and protections of collective bargaining rights for Mexican workers.[24] He criticized the role of Rahm Emanuel in particular for the deficiencies.[25]

The U.S. required its partners to adhere to environmental practices and regulations similar to its own.[26]