B402, You're kidding. Think! Obviously they are thinking of the millions of people who have been psychologically damaged by the dogmatism inherently embedded in the idea that individuals are born either totally 'male' or 'female.' You know, those people too many of whom were bashed in back alleys under cover of darkness. So much more were 30 years ago than are today, eh.Those young children who still get bullied by uneducated peers in playgrounds. People who have never identified with male or female. People who are younger than others as Courtney Act
On question of sexual identity - Courtney Act - Xanadu | Sydney New Year's Eve 2022 | ABC TV + iview
.
who have grown through it. Those who are still so terrifyingly insecure in their sexual identity.
Frankly i'm amazed you would ask the question, "So who's feeling were they afraid they'd hurt??" Would have thought the whose was obvious.
Perhaps they were concerned, had feedback, from youthful researchers? Again, I see nothing that is meant for the general public. Also, I don't read 'inclusive' as pejorative. I DO believe that word can be offensive if not harmful to white nationalists, assorted proud boys, oath keepers, insurrectionists and DuhSantis.
the terminology used in scientific discussion isn't inclusive, and could even be harmful.
Market Data 
Markets 
AI
