Heck, most of my arguments now don't even rely on anything that requires context. It's a simple matter of "district court doesn't have jurisdiction to enforce a judgment without naming a defendant and serving with process."
That's not really an argument, more a general rule.
Can you get a written explanation from your experts on how Nevada court can cancel out someone’s shares.
I showed a case were they can’t
Of course, the lower court canceled what it thought was no ownership shares which is the way GS wrote it in the motion, by not naming Calasse as owner.
Market Data 
Markets 
AI
