News Focus
News Focus
icon url

MBADude

03/06/23 12:20 AM

#62653 RE: Yolo #62650

Nonsense. Nice try to flip Yolo. Sorry to make it scary but there are implications for Caloose and the GOFF scamsters. And the supporting ecosystem.

The court appointed custodian did everything right by shareholders.
Even offered a generous settlement worth multi millions to scammy Caloose. But it was rejected perhaps due to bad advice from someone?

Now Caloose is the one who caused all this pain to shareholders. Added ZERO value to GOFF. And possibly thwarted a reverse merger by getting greedy.

Keep in mind that is a former CEO of scam ridden GOFF. A control person.

Bet Google University didn’t teach about common shareholder rights. Are you going to sing the statute of limitations song now? This Caloose episode was one year ago. Rigggghttt.
icon url

Hi_Lo

03/06/23 6:52 AM

#62672 RE: Yolo #62650

I can't wait until the NVSC ruling comes soon to prove the countless arguments wrong and end all the misdirection and mistaken references.

Calasse doesn't have a case. He is not a party to the case and has no standing to appeal.

The judge has hinted as much with the pointed question asked to Calasse.

It's as simple as that and all the cases referenced and Google searches won't change that.

And the breach of fiduciary duty lawsuit has teeth and the statute of limitations has not expired as you so often falsely claim.

Those are facts. End of discussion.