If you truly believe she has "full control" of this, then you've either ignored the signs to the contrary, or are just choosing not to believe them. How can anyone argue at this point, that the EVIDENCE of fraudulent claims doesn't outweigh the amount they have actually told the truth and followed through 100%?
Every time they've promised something they have delivered a percentage of it, or a version of the truth, but never the whole truth, and never 100% (except for a couple restricted share cancellations) which again, were far outweighed by AS and OS increases that they promised wouldn't happen.
Market Data 
Markets 
AI
