Replies to post #112995 on Voip Pal Com Inc (VPLM)

[Aloe18]

It will be simply math once one of the companies goes thru a trial. In the meantime these are numbers that VPLM has put together in the billions and the opposition says they are worth nothing, in their attempt to not pay what's owed. We need a judge/jury to decide the actual value.

[DeerBalls]

$.045 WRONG on many levels! Here we go:

1) How many are really aware of VPLM and its patents? Few, relatively. I TRULY BELIEVE VPLM COULD GO "gamestop" IF THE WORD GOT OUT. Hint/hint to the wider audience. Folks do invest in crypto... I truly doubt the haircut knows anything about VPLM...

2) One has assume rational actors to accept your claim. I recently posted the stooopid moves of the haircut(zuckerberg)>>>>$92B in buybacks @ an average PPS of $242; then the "market" pumps them up on the announcement of a new $40B in buybacks. Why, cuz meta's record is so good; they have a book value in the $40s/share. The market is what it is, but it can be FAR, FAR off from where it ends up.

3) Simple math? Why is VPLM PPS climbing? Up nearly 200% since the beginning of the year and on good volume. It ain't simple math.

4) The market is off all the time, in the long run. VPLM has been to $.45 and below a penny. That top-tick buy, if they are still holding, may come in @ a profit!

5) For me, DeerBall's thinking is all that matters. You have your belief and that is all that should matter to you. I believe VPLM goes much higher and I really hope I am correct for VPLM holders.

Be well and enjoy!

This is all simple math. Think about it. If the patents are viable and there are 10s of billions of "ongoing" infringements on them then these should be worth $100B conservatively amongst the very large companies that they are in litigation with. This means that like other large companies with revenues at this level that the share price should be at minimum $50 and probably much larger because of the "ongoing" factor that we hear about from the CEO. No company with this huge amount at stake would have a share price of where it is now and would be driven far higher based on the speculation alone of revenues that the patents could generate which tells you that all of the hype isn't real. The number just don't add up.