News Focus
News Focus
icon url

HokieHead

01/15/23 10:22 AM

#107622 RE: samsamsamiam #107620

Naked shorting is real, and exists big time! They will be the next group of nefarious characters dealt a huge death knell.

Still waiting on the long stock picks for 2023.

Thanks much.
icon url

Starlost

01/15/23 10:30 AM

#107632 RE: samsamsamiam #107620

You're exactly right. GVSI also has the worst SS of the three. And people think this is going to $$$ dollars?? What nonsense.

If there was a $2B legit company out there looking to go public, they most certainly wouldn't waste time on the scam-infested OTC! They would do a legit IPO to one of the big exchanges.

Georgie will be lucky to attract a company worth $300 - $500M - which would put the MC no higher than 25 cents. Having said that, I also know that hype and speculation can drive a SP up way beyond what the ticker would ever be worth. Heck, even now, the MC is already at $90M...for what? An empty, zero-revenue shell. So, right away, we can see that the MC is severely overpriced. Even WNFT's MC is less than half of GVSI, and it's already PC, and SRNW is even only 1/3rd the MC value of GVSI. So, it's interesting to see these comparisons.

One thing for certain, if the SP for GVSI does continue to get pumped up to some grossly overbought artificial level, what do you think will happen at merger time?? Any incoming company that can't justify the bloated MC will have an immediate and detrimental effect on the SP. It will lose its value by 50 - 75% after merger.

That is why smart traders actually know when to push the sell button, and don't listen to all the "so called FURUs who are pumping for their own benefit."

Period!

Next!!!

And as far as how well it will do, best ask yourself what billion dollar merger will enter into such a shell with such a dirty history that George himself discovered was almost impossible to audit and changed his plans to get it SEC reporting?
This is the dirtiest of his 3 for sure so play it for what it is - a short term momo play off different hyped events along the way.

icon url

LCLiving

01/15/23 10:56 AM

#107651 RE: samsamsamiam #107620

Sure, banks are honest, just ask Wells Fargo. Drugs are safe, just ask Pfizer. Elections are fair, just ask a politician. And you think those that steal thru NSS are going to report honestly???

OTC is the most unregulated and easiest to manipulate, yet you think it is unaffected? Too dam funny, or as our friend Hokie would say, what a "HOOT"!
icon url

Pogwoll

01/15/23 3:03 PM

#107742 RE: samsamsamiam #107620

Christ on a crutch! Proof once again of lack of understanding about short volume vs short interest.


And around and around we go. Dodge and weave. Doesn't change the fact I have provided an ample amount of examples explaining the difference between the two concepts and why it's relevant to gvsi. Your deflection of glaring evidence to the contrary of your argument points to one thing imo. But I digress.

All the recent litigation by the SEC against promoters is all the proof you need to see what they are doing. BigMoneyMike, Computerbux, DeLarge, OcMillionaire, Neilsen - -Blaming Shorty when stocks collapse when the truth is they are the ones selling into their frontloaded pumps while screaming MOASS.


You failed to provide context to this point. These frauds you mentioned were colluding with one another. Dms sent back and forth along with communication on private discords as they front loaded plays and duped their followers into thinking they were buying when they were actually selling. Comparing this to investors in Gvsi who are now about to see a return on their investment ( a lot of us are coming up on 2 years we've been invested here) when there was significant risk at many stages throughout this process that we would lose everything we had invested is a far cry from "frontloading" a stock. The fact you would even offer this comparison, quite frankly, is laughable.

This is a momo play that even comes with a warning from George about listening to self serving promoters


Not accurate. Sharp has repeatedly said he's not interested in appeasing any quick buck artists and if one is not comfortable with these extended timelines to avoid investing in his companies. Kind of flies in the face of the whole "pump and dump" argument you put forward.
The only part of your comment I do agree with is investors should listen to what George Sharp and his team announce with regards to specific details pertaining to gvsi such as share cancelations, merger candidates and so forth.